ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Radiographic Assessment of the Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant Before and After the Prosthesis Placement-A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized clinical study to compare implant stability and bone loss between different implant designs.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Immediate Loading of Implants Placed Immediately in Fresh Sockets: A 10-Year Single-Arm Prospective Case Series Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Prostheses: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The present investigation performed the CBCT to measure the marginal bone loss surrounding the implant both before and after the prosthesis was placed. Materials and Methods: Within the age range of 21 to 45 years, a total of 20 patients were involved, and all participants gave their informed consent. Immediate implant was inserted and ceramic prosthesis was prepared and given to the patients. Radiographic assessment was carried out using the CBCT at baseline, three months, and six months following the prosthesis. The circumference of the crestal bone level around the implant was measured in all directions (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal), using the implant's first thread as a standard reference point. Results: The change of the mean marginal bone level at the time of implant placement to three months after the prosthesis was at mesial 1.32 ± 0.02 to 1.46 ± 0.10, at distal 1.46 ± 0.08 to 1.94 ± 0.14, at buccal 1.28 ± 0.01 to 1.40 ± 0.06, at palatal 1.20 ± 0.03 to 1.22 ± 0.04. The change of the mean marginal bone level at the time of implant placement to six months after the prosthesis was at mesial 1.32 ± 0.02 to 1.84 ± 0.12, at distal 1.46 ± 0.08 to 2.38 ± 0.02, at buccal 1.28 ± 0.01 to 1.78 ± 0.04, at palatal 1.20 ± 0.03 to 1.34 ± 0.01. Conclusion: The current investigation came to the conclusion that the CBCT provides all the diagnostic information required for an implant to be placed successfully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.