ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconia Crown Systems Using Self-Adhesive Resin, Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer, and Glass Ionomer Cements: A Stereomicroscopic
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microleakage is a critical issue impacting the success of zirconia crown restorations. This study compares the effectiveness of self-adhesive resin cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and glass ionomer cement in minimizing microleakage, aiming to enhance the longevity and reliability of zirconia crowns systems. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted premolars were collected, and all-ceramic preparation was done. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into three groups (10 each): Group A (self-adhesive resin cement), Group B (resin-modified glass ionomer cement), and Group C (glass ionomer cement). The samples underwent thermocycling, were sectioned mesiodistally and buccolingually, and submerged in a solution of methylene blue. Under a stereomicroscope, the surface of each segment was digitally imaged. A five-point grading system was used to assess microleakage. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney Result: Microleakage with all the cement was comparable with no significant difference. The adhesive resin cement showed the least microleakage followed by resin-modified glass ionomer cement and the conventional glass ionomer cement, although insignificant. Conclusion: Resin cement, amongst all the adhesive cement, had the least microleakage; however, it was statistically insignificant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.