ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Effect of MMP Inhibitors on Shear Bond Strength of Adhesive to Dentin after Different Drying Techniques: An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Improving Bonding Durability in Dental Restorations: The Impact of Bioactive and Reinforcement Particles on Universal Adhesives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Instead of excessive drying or wetness, maintaining an optimal moisture level on the dentin surface may enhance the polymerization process of certain monomers. The study was intended to contrast and evaluate the effect of Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) inhibitors (Chlorhexidine (CHX) and Doxycycline (DOX)) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of adhesive dentin interface after different drying techniques (blotting with tissue paper (TP) and damp cotton pellet (CP)). Materials and Methods: Ninety molars collected were split into three groups according to the materials used during the acid etching step: Group A (control): 37% phosphoric acid only; Group B: 37% phosphoric acid followed by 2% CHX; Group C: 37% phosphoric acid followed by 2% DOX. Each group was categorized into 2 subgroups based on the drying methods used after etching (TP and damp CP). A universal bonding agent was applied after this and composite restoration was placed onto the dentin and cured. The samples underwent thermocycling for 500 thermocycles for degradation of the adhesive surface. The SBS of the specimens was appraised with a universal testing machine until fracture. Results: The CHX group blotted with TP (20.98 ± 0.29 MPa) had the highest SBS among the study sample. This was eventually followed by the CHX group blotted with the CP (18.99 ± 0.28 MPa), DOX blotted with TP (19.73 ± 0.51 MPa), and DOX blotted with the CP (17.09 ± 0.55 MPa). The least SBS was observed in the control group blotted with TP (16.9 ± 0.22 MPa) and then by CP (13.78 ± 0.55 MPa). Conclusion: The study showed that CHX had a superior effect on the SBS when compared to DOX. Among the drying agents used TP yielded better results than drying with a damp CP. The overall SBS was high in the CHX group dried with TP and the least strength was shown by the control group where treatment with an MMP inhibitor was done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.