ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Assessment of Orthofacial Analysis in Indigenous Tribes: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The indigenous tribes still exist in our Chennai, which found quite interesting for us to conduct a survey on the prevalence of malocclusion and facial symmetry.
aimThis study aims to assess the prevalence of malocclusion and facial symmetry in indigenous tribes: the narikurava. Setting and design: The study was a cross-sectional survey. Material and Methods: One hundred and twenty-one individuals participated in the study. The prevalence of malocclusion was assessed as normal occlusion, class 1, class 2 and class 3 occlusion, and facial symmetry was recorded along with facial aesthetic index. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the variables recorded in our study, and chi-square test was done to find the association between the gender and facial aesthetic index. Results: Among the indigenous tribes, 33.9% had normal occlusion, 31.4% had class 1 occlusion, 14.9% had class 2 div 1 occlusion, 9.1% had class 2 div 2 occlusion, and 10.7% had class 3 occlusion. Males had a higher percentage of normal occlusion than compared to females. Conclusion: Even an infant wants to have a good smile which is aesthetic in nature; here, in the survey conducted more than 30% of individuals were having a normal occlusion, and only about 9% individuals were having class 2 division 2 which is least occlusion seen among the indigenous tribes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.