ArticleJTCVS open2025
Potential advantage of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting thoracic wall infiltration in pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective single-center analysis.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Diagnostic Approach to Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.Pulmonary therapy · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Chest CT Volumetric Analysis in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Thoracic wall infiltration in pleural mesothelioma determines the extent of resection and can be an important prognostic factor. Currently, standardized imaging for restaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy comprises contrast-enhanced computed tomography or positron emission tomography. Additional thoracic magnetic resonance imaging could better discriminate chest wall infiltration preoperatively and increase staging accuracy. For this reason, the added benefit of magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated at our center. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the extended imaging protocol was performed from July 2018 to March 2024, including a descriptive analysis for the patient's sex, age, tobacco consumption, asbestos exposure, histological subtype, TNM stage, Modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors in solid tumors, and number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles. Preoperative restaging included routine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging. After histological diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma, neoadjuvant therapy was conducted, followed by intended macroscopic complete resection, with intraoperative biopsies of suspicious chest wall lesions. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging results were compared with intraoperative biopsies. Results: Twenty-six patients (mean age, 65.50 years, 11.50% female) with operable pleural mesothelioma were included. Of the 11 patients with histologically proven chest wall infiltration, 10 (90.91%) had a cT-stage 3 or greater and 4 (36.36%) underwent surgery that resulted in an R2 resection. Thoracic magnetic resonance imaging showed a high sensitivity (90.91%) for the detection of chest wall infiltration, especially when compared with the computed tomography scan (9.09%). Conclusions: With the adjunctive use of magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrated a higher sensitivity for detection of chest wall infiltration compared with conventional imaging before surgery. This may improve patient selection for surgery. Nevertheless, larger studies are required to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.