ArticleJTCVS open2025
Temporal trends in the utilization, costs, and outcomes of concomitant left atrial appendage closure across a statewide collaborative.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: With the rising incidence of atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) at the time of cardiac surgery remains an important adjunct. The present study characterized trends, associated resource utilization, and potential disparities in the use of left atrial appendage exclusion. Methods: Using a Society of Thoracic Surgeons regional academic collaborative database, we queried all adult patients undergoing coronary and valve procedures with concomitant LAAC between 2015 and 2021. Trends in LAAC, as well as the technique for closure, were evaluated. Multilevel hierarchical logistic modeling was applied to delineate factors associated with LAAC, accounting for patient and operative characteristics. Generalized linear models were developed to perform risk-adjusted incremental cost analysis. Results: Of the 8699 patients who met the study criteria, 1377 underwent left atrial appendage closure. Over the study period, the annual rate of LAAC increased from 16.7% to 30.8% ( Conclusions: Rates of LAAC are increasing but less common among female patients, as well as those requiring urgent/emergent interventions. LAAC did not significantly impact short-term mortality. Our results suggest that LAAC may be a high-value intervention among patient populations that have the greatest potential to derive its benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.