ArticleJTCVS open2025
External validation of the German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative MELD score variants and survival trajectories following in acute type A aortic dissection with follow‑up up to three years.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Early Outcomes After Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk in Elderly Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2026Article
- The GERAADA Risk Score for Early Mortality After Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: An External Validation in the Dutch Setting.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Prognostic assessment and intelligent prediction system for breast reduction surgery using improved swarm intelligence optimization.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality compared with routine cardiac surgical procedures. The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score has been recommended for use as a mortality risk-stratification tool in recent guidelines. We sought to externally validate this score in our local population. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2007 to 2021 were included. Logistic regression analyses were performed. Model discrimination was assessed by C-statistic with 95% CIs as part of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Model performance was visualized by calibration plot and quantified by the Brier score. Results: A total of 587 patients were included. The mean age was 61 years (±13.5), with 42.08% of patients aged more than 65 years; 40.37% were female. The mean circulatory arrest time was 30.9 minutes (±16.5). Hemiarch replacement was performed in 62% of patients, and total arch replacement was performed in 35.3% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was observed in 66 patients (11.24%), and stroke was present in 7.16% of patients. The C-statistic revealed good discriminatory ability for predicting 30-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.79; Conclusions: The German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A score for 30-day mortality showed good discriminatory ability in our local population along with good ability for prediction of mortality, indicating its potential clinical utility in the population with acute type A aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.