ArticleJTCVS open2025
Surgical removal of pulmonary flow restrictors in children with congenital heart disease: What the outcomes reveal.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Proposal: Bold New Indications for Transcatheter Pulmonary Flow Restrictors.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Balloon dilation of the para-device space to alleviate severe flow restriction in an oversized pulmonary flow restrictor: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) are interesting devices, but their surgical removal outcomes are poorly understood. Methods: Retrospective review of clinical data from children with bilateral PFRs who underwent device removal during follow-up surgery. Results: Thirty-four PFRs were explanted from 17 patients (41.2% boys) at a median of 2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.2-5.2 months) postimplantation, with a median patient age of 2.5 months (IQR, 1.6-5.8 months). One patient experienced life-threatening bilateral pulmonary artery (PA) aneurysms 2 months after PFR implantation, necessitating urgent surgery. Two PFRs were found migrated across the left PA's upper lobe branch origin. Twenty-six were removed intact, 1 in 2 fragments, and 7 piecemeal. No thrombus was noted. Neoendothelium was observed on 11 PFRs. Seven PFRs caused endothelial damage, requiring sharp and blunt dissection for removal. Six right and 4 left PA arteriotomies were patched. Hegar dilators, with median sizes of 7 mm (IQR, 6.8-8.3 mm) for right PA and 7 mm (IQR, 7-8 mm) for left PA, confirmed branch patency. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months (IQR, 10.2-18.3 months), echocardiographic maximum velocities in 13 biventricular patients and 2 awaiting future biventricular repair were 1.5 m/second (IQR, 1.4-1.7 m/second) for the left PA and 1.6 m/second (IQR, 1.4-1.7 m/second) for the right PA. One patient with deferred Norwood had normal PAs and well-positioned PFRs on prestage-II catheterization. A patient who underwent stage-II Norwood 3.2 months post-PFR implantation died from sepsis 1 month later, but post-Glenn angiogram revealed no stenosis. Conclusions: PFR removal is safe and effective. Complications are manageable, with no PA stenosis observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.