ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Completion of Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening at a Community Health Center.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Screening for colorectal cancer decreases mortality. Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) decreases some barriers to screening, however positive results require colonoscopy. We evaluated factors associated with colonoscopy completion for community health center (CHC) patients after positive FOBT. Methods: We identified patients of one CHC with positive FOBT from 1/1/2018-12/31/2021. We performed chart reviews for demographics, insurance status, FOBT date, colonoscopy referral date and site, and colonoscopy results.We performed descriptive analysis. We fitted a logistic model and employed stepwise selection to evaluate effect of variables influencing likelihood of colonoscopy. We employed forward and backward model selection to identify the reduced model with the lowest Akaike Information Criterion score. Using this model, we calculated hypothesis tests for each coefficient using Wald tests with an alpha level of 0.05. Results: Overall, 50% of participants completed colonoscopy. Mean time between positive FOBT and colonoscopy completion was 237.4 days (SD 187.9). The reduced logistic model included age and health insurance covariates. Insured patients were 221.7% more likely to complete colonoscopy than uninsured patients. A seven-year increase in age was associated with 41.2% increase in likelihood of colonoscopy. An increase of 38 miles to the colonoscopy site was associated with 17.7% decrease in likelihood of completion. Conclusions: Only half of participants with positive FOBT completed colonoscopy. On average, nearly eight months elapsed between FOBT and colonoscopy. Having insurance was the strongest predictor of colonoscopy, despite available financial aid programs. Longer distances to colonoscopy sites decreased likelihood of completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.