Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061461›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025

Impact of action observation therapy on motor and cognitive outcomes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study.

Miriam Martin-Blazquez, M Dolores Sosa-Reina, Angye Micaela Andrade-Granda, Ismael Sanz-Esteban, Javier López-Ruiz, Cecilia Estrada Barranco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07209709 (Comparison of the Effects of Dual Task Training and Action Observation Therapy Given to Geriatric Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07209709 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of the Effects of Dual Task Training and Action Observation Therapy Given to Geriatric Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsComparison of the Effects of Different Therapies in Geriatric IndividualsArmsConventional exercises with dual task training (cognitive task), Conventional Exercise With Action Observation Therapy, Conventional Exercise (Control Group)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam Martin-BlazquezPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M Dolores Sosa-ReinaPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Angye Micaela Andrade-GrandaPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ismael Sanz-EstebanPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier López-RuizPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cecilia Estrada BarrancoPhysiotherapy Department, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) affects both cognitive and motor function, increasing the risk of immobility, falls, and compromising independence. The aim of this study is to determine whether implementing Action Observation Therapy (AOT) in a population with MCI would yield positive outcomes in cognitive status, in activities of daily living (ADLs), upper limb (UL) functionality, gait and balance, and if these results differ based on the observation modality employed. Methods: Thirty participants, aged 65 and above with MCI, were assigned to three groups: therapist observation group (TOG), peer observation group (POG), and control group (CG). The intervention comprised physical and cognitive exercises over 5 weeks, with assessments before and after. Results: significant differences in post-intervention improvement were found between the groups, excluding the Box and block test. No significant differences were found between the TOG and POG in any improvement variable. Significant differences were found between the CG and the observation groups. Conclusions: The intervention with AOT proved beneficial for individuals with MCI, yielding significant results both when observing the therapist and when observing a peer compared to the CG, in the domains: cognition, ADLs, gait and balance.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGaitHumansMalePostural Balanceaction observation therapymild cognitive impairmentmirror neuronsolder adultsphysical training

Identifiers

PMID40061461
PMCPMC11885144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.