ArticleSexual medicine2025
Unveiling consumer interest and regional disparities: comparative analysis of online search trends for penile aesthetic procedures.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aesthetic procedures for penile enhancement, such as the Penuma silicone sleeve implant, have gained increasing attention for addressing concerns like perceived size, buried or retractile penis, and mild curvature. Aim: To assess the online search interest over time for penile enhancement modalities, analyze the trends, and explore any regional disparities in search patterns. Methods: Google Trends data from June 18, 2018, to June 11, 2023, were utilized to analyze search interest for Penuma, penile implant, penile girth, Hyaluronic acid (HLA) injection, and penis injection. The results were compared to the trend data for Penuma from 2004 to 2023. Trendlines were generated to assess the changes in search interest over time and determine if they followed a random or polynomial trend. The highest search interest locations were identified for each term, and the corresponding regional gross domestic product values were collected. Outcomes: Search interest was assessed in terms of volume, temporal trends, and regional disparities. Clinical Implications: Understanding regional and temporal search patterns for penile enhancement can guide healthcare professionals and policymakers in developing targeted educational initiatives and allocating resources to meet patient needs. Strengths and Limitations: The use of Google Trends provides a comprehensive and real-time assessment of public interest over a broad timeframe and geographic range. However, search interest data may not fully capture actual patient behaviors or clinical demand, and the analysis relies on assumptions about search terms accurately reflecting consumer intent. Results: Penuma initially garnered interest upon its introduction in 2004 but experienced a decline until around March 2021. Comparing Penuma with other terms, general searches for penile implant and penile girth exhibited significantly higher interest than Penuma. The trendlines indicated increasing search interest for penile implant and HLA injection, while Penuma demonstrated a declining trend. In terms of regional disparities, the highest search interest for Penuma was observed in San Antonio, TX, while penile girth searches were highest in Oklahoma City, OK. Penile implant searches were prominent in Mobile, AL, and Birmingham, AL. Notably, HLA injection searches peaked in New York, NY, and penis injection searches were most prevalent in Los Angeles, CA. Conclusion: This study reveals that online interest in Penuma lags other penile enhancement terms, with notable regional disparities in search patterns. These findings underscore the need for further research to understand the factors influencing these trends and to help healthcare professionals tailor educational efforts and resources to diverse consumer needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.