ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
CARE: towards customized assistive robot-based education.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The influence of individual characteristics on children's learning with a social robot versus a human.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transforming thyroid disease education: AI and virtual technologies in residency training.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a novel approach to enhancing the learning experience of elementary school students by integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics in education, focusing on personalized and adaptive learning. Unlike existing adaptive and intelligent tutoring systems, which primarily rely on digital platforms, our approach employs a personalized tutor robot to interact with students directly, combining cognitive and emotional assessment to deliver tailored educational experiences. This work extends the current research landscape by integrating real-time facial expression analysis, subjective feedback, and performance metrics to classify students into three categories: Proficient Students (Prof.S), Meeting-Expectations Students (MES), and Developing Students (DVS). These classifications are used to deliver customized learning content, motivational messages, and constructive feedback. The primary research question guiding this study is: Does personalization enhance the effectiveness of a robotic tutor in fostering improved learning outcomes? To address this, the study explores two key aspects: (1) how personalization contributes to a robotic tutor's ability to adapt to individual student needs, thereby enhancing engagement and academic performance, and (2) how the effectiveness of a personalized robotic tutor compares to a human teacher, which serves as a benchmark for evaluating the system's impact. Our study contrasts the personalized robot with a human teacher to highlight the potential of personalization in robotic tutoring within a real-world educational context. While a comparison with a generic, unpersonalized robot could further isolate the impact of personalization, our choice of comparison with a human teacher underscores the broader objective of positioning personalized robotic tutors as viable and impactful educational tools. The robot's AI-powered system, employing the XGBoost algorithm, predicts the student's proficiency level with high accuracy (100%), leveraging factors such as test scores, task completion time, and emotional engagement. Challenges and learning materials are dynamically adjusted to suit each student's needs, with DVS receiving supportive exercises and Prof. S receiving advanced tasks. Our methodology goes beyond existing literature by embedding a fully autonomous robotic system within a classroom setting to assess and enhance learning outcomes. Evaluation through post-diagnostic exams demonstrated that the experimental group of students using the AI-robot system showed a significant improvement rate (approximately 8%) over the control group. These findings highlight the unique contribution of this study to the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and educational robotics, showcasing how integrating AI and robotics in a real-world learning environment can engage students and improve educational outcomes. By situating our work within the broader context of intelligent tutoring systems and addressing existing gaps, this study provides a unique contribution to the field. It aligns with and builds upon recent advancements, while offering a distinct perspective by incorporating robotics to foster both academic and emotional engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.