ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Predictors for the Efficacy of 4-Week Dupilumab Treatment in Atopic Dermatitis Patients.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Immunogenetic Landscape of Allergic Rhinitis: from Cellular Effectors to Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapies.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory disease with heterogeneous clinical features. Certain meaningful phenotypes and clinical features may help better classify AD patients for personalized medicine. To our knowledge, no ideal predictors have been found so far. We aim to investigate clinical predictors for the 4-week efficacy of dupilumab treatment in AD patients in the real world. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-three AD patients treated with dupilumab were enrolled between June 2020 and December 2023. Patients' information, characteristics, and medical history were collected. They were evaluated at the baseline and 4 weeks after dupilumab treatment and divided into groups according to the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) and peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) score. Statistical analyses were used to evaluate potential predictors. Results: Age increase, late-onset, erythroderma type, and elevation of total serum IgE level were risk factors for poor response after 4-week treatment. Female, atopic personal or family history, and allergic rhinitis were factors for better response. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed extrinsic AD had a poor reaction than intrinsic AD (OR=4.792,95% CI 1.460-15.732, Conclusion: Extrinsic AD and chronic lichenoid eczema are risk factors for poor response to 4-week dupilumab treatment, which suggests that AD patients with extrinsic and chronic lichenoid eczema may need more patience for long-term treatment or make other options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.