Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061420›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Time-Dependent Changes in the Coronary Circulation Triggered by CTO Revascularization: Insights From Intracoronary Physiology.

Marco Lombardi, Emil Nielsen Holck, Adrian Jerónimo, Pablo Salinas, Nieves Gonzalo, Evald Høj Christiansen, Javier Escaned

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marco LombardiHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Emil Nielsen HolckHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Adrian JerónimoHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo SalinasHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nieves GonzaloHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Evald Høj ChristiansenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Javier EscanedHospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, and CIBERCV, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physiological changes in the coronary circulation associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTOs) remain largely unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate physiological changes in the CTO and donor vessel before and immediately after PCI, as well as at follow-up. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase identified relevant studies. The primary end point was the mean difference (MD) between fractional flow reserve myocardium (FFR Results: A total of 17 studies were included. The myocardial blood flow in the donor vessel increased after CTO revascularization (FFR Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that CTO revascularization leads to an immediate and long-term improvement in blood supply to downstream myocardium, mediated in part by a favorable time-dependent shift in epicardial vessel, collateral, and microcirculatory function.

Indexed as

chronic total occlusionfractional flow reserveintracoronary physiologymicrocirculationpercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID40061420
PMCPMC11887561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.