Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061412›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Novel Mechanical Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Results From the Prospective APEX-AV Trial.

Mona Ranade, Malcolm T Foster, Paul S Brady, Seth I Sokol, Sabah Butty, Andrew Klein, Robert Maholic, Ammar Safar, Taral Patel, David Zlotnick and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Addition by Subtraction: A Novel Device for Pulmonary Embolus Thrombectomy.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mona RanadeDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Malcolm T FosterInterventional Cardiology, Tennova Healthcare Turkey Creek Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Paul S BradySection of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Einstein Health Care Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Seth I SokolDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Sabah ButtyDepartment of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Andrew KleinInterventional Cardiology, Vascular and Endovascular Medicine, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
Robert MaholicInterventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hamot, Erie, Pennsylvania.
Ammar SafarInterventional Cardiology, Kettering Health, Miamisburg, Ohio.
Taral PatelHonorHealth Research Institute, HonorHealth, Scottsdale, Arizona.
David ZlotnickDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gates Vascular Institute, Buffalo General Medical Center, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Daniel GansInterventional Radiology, OSF HealthCare, Peoria, Illinois.
Jeffrey PollakVascular and Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Dean FerreraDepartment of Cardiology, Community Hospital, Munster, Indiana.
Brian StegmanInterventional Cardiology, CentraCare Heart and Vascular Center, St. Cloud, Minnesota.
Sukhdeep BasraCenter for Advanced Heart Failure, University of Texas Health Science Center and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas.
John MoriartyDivision of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Brent KeelingDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a need for additional data to assess procedural efficacy and risks associated with mechanical thrombectomy for treating pulmonary embolism (PE) due to its increased utilization and diversity of patient populations presenting with PE. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the AlphaVac F18 Methods: Patients with acute intermediate-risk PE and a right ventricular (RV)/left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio of ≥0.9 were eligible for enrollment in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. The primary effectiveness end point was reduction in the RV/LV ratio at 48 hours. The primary safety end point was the rate of major adverse events (MAEs) defined as subjects who experienced major bleeding, device-related deaths, clinical deterioration, or pulmonary vascular or cardiac injury within 48 hours postprocedurally. Results: In total, 122 subjects were enrolled at 25 sites. Mean procedure time was 37.2 ± 17.7 minutes. There were statistically significant reductions in mean 48-hour postprocedural RV/LV diameter ratio (-0.45 ± 0.27; Conclusions: Percutaneous mechanical aspiration thrombectomy with the AlphaVac system provided a safe and effective treatment for acute intermediate-risk PE with a significant reduction in RV/LV ratio and clot burden with a low rate of adverse events.

Indexed as

AlphaVacaspiration thrombectomyintermediate-risk pulmonary embolismmechanical thrombectomythrombusvacuum aspiration

Identifiers

PMID40061412
PMCPMC11887559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.