ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Modified protocol for pterygium surgery without blades and electrocoagulation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- PentagonalInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of a blade- and cautery-free surgical protocol for pterygium removal. Methods: Pterygium removal surgery was done in 69 eyes (67 patients; 24 males and 43 females) who were followed up for at least 6 months. The surgery was characterized by blunt separation of the pterygium from the head to the limbal arc using the tip of Vannas scissors and modified procedures, such as transpositional flapping and suture closure. Neither a blade nor a cautery was used. Results: The reported subjects were 60.7 years old on average, and most of them had primary pterygium (66 out of 69). The proposed surgical protocol was simple to perform, requiring an average operation time of 18.7 min which was shorter than that of the suture and fibrin glue groups mentioned in relevant reports. Post-anesthesia pain was relieved quickly 1 day after surgery without the use of pain killers. During the follow-up period of 11.3 ± 3.1 months, recurrence of pterygium requiring additional surgery was seen in only three eyes (4.3%). Conclusion: The potential of the examined protocol as an easy, efficient, and reliable approach was demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.