ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Status and Opportunities of Machine Learning Applications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Review.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent and potentially severe sleep disorder characterized by repeated interruptions in breathing during sleep. Machine learning models have been increasingly applied in various aspects of OSA research, including diagnosis, treatment optimization, and developing biomarkers for endotypes and disease mechanisms. Objective: This narrative review evaluates the application of machine learning in OSA research, focusing on model performance, dataset characteristics, demographic representation, and validation strategies. We aim to identify trends and gaps to guide future research and improve clinical decision-making that leverages machine learning. Methods: This narrative review examines data extracted from 254 scientific publications published in the PubMed database between January 2018 and March 2023. Studies were categorized by machine learning applications, models, tasks, validation metrics, data sources, and demographics. Results: Our analysis revealed that most machine learning applications focused on OSA classification and diagnosis, utilizing various data sources such as polysomnography, electrocardiogram data, and wearable devices. We also found that study cohorts were predominantly overweight males, with an underrepresentation of women, younger obese adults, individuals over 60 years old, and diverse racial groups. Many studies had small sample sizes and limited use of robust model validation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for more inclusive research approaches, starting with adequate data collection in terms of sample size and bias mitigation for better generalizability of machine learning models in OSA research. Addressing these demographic gaps and methodological opportunities is critical for ensuring more robust and equitable applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.