Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061329›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Perceptions of Telerehabilitation Among Patients Receiving Physical Therapy for Spine Pain.

Kevin H McLaughlin, Olivia Caan, Richard L Skolasky

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin H McLaughlinJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Olivia CaanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery.
Richard L SkolaskyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Orthopaedic Surgery.

Funding

Improving Function and Reducing Opioid Use for Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain in Rural Communities through Improved Access to Physical Therapy using TelerehabilitationUH3AR083838 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kevin McLaughlin, RICHARD L. SKOLASKY · 2024 to 2026
$3.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS UH3 AR083838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Telerehabilitation was widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain access to physical therapy. However, its use has declined since the pandemic, potentially due to changes in patient demand. Objective: To explore patients' beliefs, attitudes, and preferences regarding telerehabilitation for spine pain treatment. Design: Email or telephone administered survey. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy network affiliated with an academic healthcare system. Participants: Patients recently evaluated for spine pain by a physical therapist (n=100). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey items addressed patients' perceptions of telerehabilitation effectiveness, preferences for care delivery, barriers to telerehabilitation, and factors influencing telerehabilitation use. Results: Patients viewed telerehabilitation as effective for treating spine pain but not as effective as in-clinic physical therapy. Patients reported a preference for receiving care in-clinic care or using a hybrid model, rather than receiving care through telerehabilitation alone. Barriers to telerehabilitation included a lack of awareness of who offers telerehabilitation and uncertainty about its effectiveness. Patients indicated that evidence supporting telerehabilitation effectiveness would increase their likelihood of using telerehabilitation in the future. Patients also reported that transportation challenges or increased COVID-19 rates would encourage them to use telerehabilitation in the future. Conclusions: The results of this survey suggest that patients with spine pain believe telerehabilitation may be an effective treatment approach, but they are skeptical about using telerehabilitation instead of in-clinic physical therapy. These results also suggest that patients are open to hybrid approaches that incorporate telerehabilitation, as well as using telerehabilitation if circumstances prevented them from receiving their care in-clinic. The largest patient concern surrounding telerehabilitation seems to be the lack of evidence supporting its effectiveness. Relevance: This study suggests that patients believe telerehabilitation will continue to play an important role post-pandemic. However, comparative effectiveness research is needed to address patient concerns surrounding the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and guide informed decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID40061329
PMCPMC11888522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.