ArticlePeerJ2025
Outcomes of metabolic syndrome and anxiety levels in light and heavy smokers.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of probiotics on anxiety, depression, nicotine dependence, and metabolic biomarkers in smokers: a randomized clinical trial.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Trial
- Article
- Association of cigarette smoking intensity and pack-years with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Smokers Versus Non-Smokers.Maedica · 2025Article
- BMI partially mediates the association between the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and depression in obese adults.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Metabolic syndrome: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the impact of smoking status, as measured by pack-years (PY), on components of metabolic syndrome while considering the influence of anxiety. Design: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a smoking cessation clinic in Turkey, enrolling individuals who visited the clinic in 2022. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were utilized as assessment tools, while metabolic syndrome parameters (body mass index, hypertension, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia) were evaluated. Smoking status was classified based on pack-years. Results: The study revealed a dose-dependent relationship between smoking status and essential metabolic factors such as systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Notably, triglyceride (TG) levels exhibited a significant increase, particularly at 25 pack years. While anxiety levels did not exhibit a significant correlation with smoking status, they demonstrated an upward trend with increasing SBP and DBP values. Anxiety levels did not exhibit a significant correlation with smoking status. Conclusions: A significant association was identified between nicotine addiction, as indicated by PY, and both metabolic syndrome parameters and anxiety levels. Early smoking cessation is strongly recommended for current smokers, and former smokers are advised to abstain from smoking to mitigate its adverse effects on metabolic syndrome components. These findings underscore the interconnectedness of cigarette smoking's effects on both physical and mental health, emphasizing the necessity of comprehensive approaches encompassing both metabolic disorder management and mental health support within cessation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.