ArticlePeerJ2025
Determining population structure from k-mer frequencies.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel genetic profile linked to cognitive decline in Hispanics/Latinos.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding population structure within species provides information on connections among different populations and how they evolve over time. This knowledge is important for studies ranging from evolutionary biology to large-scale variant-trait association studies. Current approaches to determining population structure include model-based approaches, statistical approaches, and distance-based ancestry inference approaches. Methods: In this work, we identify population structure from DNA sequence data using an alignment-free approach. We use the frequencies of short DNA substrings from across the genome (k-mers) with principal component analysis (PCA). K-mer frequencies can be viewed as a summary statistic of a genome and have the advantage of being easily derived from a genome by counting the number of times a k-mer occurred in a sequence. In contrast, most population structure work employing PCA uses multi-locus genotype data (SNPs, microsatellites, or haplotypes). No genetic assumptions must be met to generate k-mers, whereas current population structure approaches often depend on several genetic assumptions and can require careful selection of ancestry informative markers to identify populations. We compare our k-mer based approach to population structure estimated using SNPs with both empirical and simulated data. Results: In this work, we show that PCA is able to determine population structure just from the frequency of k-mers found in the genome. The application of PCA and a clustering algorithm to k-mer profiles of genomes provides an easy approach to detecting the number and composition of populations (clusters) present in the dataset. Using simulations, we show that results are at least comparable to population structure estimates using SNPs. When using human genomes from populations identified by the 1000 Genomes Project, the results are better than population structure estimates using SNPs from the same samples, and comparable to those found by a model-based approach using genetic markers from larger numbers of samples. Conclusions: This study shows that PCA, together with the clustering algorithm, is able to detect population structure from k-mer frequencies and can separate samples of admixed and non-admixed origin. Using k-mer frequencies to determine population structure has the potential to avoid some challenges of existing methods and may even improve on estimates from small samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.