ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
Innovative 3D-printed porous tantalum cage with non-window design to accelerate spinal fusion: A proof-of-concept study.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Section on innovative spine research and novel technologies: fusion cage design, materials, and coatings: Science versus hype.North American Spine Society journal · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Tantalum Wedge Shows Promising Early Results for Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Mean 50-Month Follow-Up.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Is Ti-Coated PEEK Superior to PEEK for Lumbar and Cervical Fusion Procedures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Application of Biologic and Synthetic Bone Grafts in Scoliosis Surgery: A Scoping Review of Emerging Technologies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Systematic Review of Metal Composite Bone Grafts in Preclinical Spinal Fusion Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Personalized porous tantalum implants crafted via 3D printing: new horizons in complex cervical-thoracic spinal fusion.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An interbody fusion cage is crucial in spine fusion procedures, serving to restore physiological vertebral alignment and reestablish spinal stability. However, conventional fusion cages often face challenges related to insufficient osteointegration and the requirement for substantial bone grafting, which may result in incomplete fusion and prolonged recovery periods. In this study, we harnessed the osteointegration advantages of tantalum (Ta), in conjunction with advanced 3D printing technology, to develop a novel non-window-type Ta cage. The mechanical and biological characteristics of the cage were comprehensively evaluated through mechanical testing, in vitro cellular assays, and in vivo sheep anterior cervical discectomy and fusion models. The results indicated that the 3D-printed porous tantalum (3D-pTa) cage, with mechanical properties analogous to those of trabecular bone, exhibited superior bone ingrowth and osseointegration performance, achieving excellent intervertebral fusion without the need for bone grafting, thereby enhancing cervical vertebra stability. Moreover, we performed a pilot clinical trial to assess the performance of non-window-type 3D-pTa cages in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The results demonstrated that 3D-pTa achieved favorable clinical outcomes up to the 12-month follow-up period. These results highlight the significant clinical potential of the 3D-pTa cage for spinal fusion applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.