ReviewAntibody therapeutics2024
Beyond ADCs: harnessing bispecific antibodies to directly induce apoptosis for targeted tumor eradication.
Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative In Vitro Apoptotic Activity of Two Chimeric Anti-CD99 Antibodies Recognizing Distinct CD99 Regions in T-ALL Models.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Cytotoxic activity and safety characterization of IMV-M™, a MUC16 × DR5 bispecific antibody.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer and beyond: progress, promise, and perspectives.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bispecific apoptosis triggers (BATs) are innovative bispecific antibodies designed to simultaneously target both a tumor-associated antigen and a cancer cell's death receptor, thereby directly activating the extrinsic apoptotic pathway to induce death of cancer cells. This unique mechanism distinguishes BATs from antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which rely on cytotoxic drugs, and bispecific immune cell engagers such as bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and bispecific natural killer cell engagers (NKCEs), which recruit immune cells to eliminate target cancer cells. BATs offer significant potential advantages in clinical efficacy and safety over ADCs and BiTEs. Although the field is still emerging, recent advancements are highly promising, and analysis of preclinical and clinical data of DR5-targeting antibodies have been pivotal in outlining the criteria for the next generation of effective and safe medicines. Antibodies found inactive in preclinical testing were also found to be clinically ineffective, whereas antibodies with minimal preclinical results demonstrated moderate clinical activity. All clinical DR5-targeting antibodies were well tolerated by patients even at high doses (with the exception of TAS266 due to its unique design). These findings underscore the predictive value of robust preclinical models on clinical outcomes. Notably, first-in-class BAT, Cancerlysin™ IMV-M, demonstrated potent efficacy in diverse xenograft cancer models and safety in non-human primates, marking a significant advancement in developing safe and effective anti-cancer drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.