Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061204›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Lateral Transorbital Approach for Lateral Sphenoid Defects: Anatomy, Surgery, Nasoseptal Flap Use, and a 4-Case Series.

Darlene Lubbe, Lien Deschuytere, Kris S Moe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Darlene LubbeDivision of Otorhinolaryngology University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1065-0694
Lien DeschuytereDivision of Otorhinolaryngology University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-0521
Kris S MoeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery University of Washington Washington DC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and anatomical advantages of the lateral transorbital approach for complex skull base repairs in the lateral recess of a pneumatized sphenoid sinus and compare it to standard transnasal methods. Methods: Case series of four patients across two institutions (Otorhinolaryngology and Neurosurgery departments in Cape Town, South Africa, and Seattle, USA). Three patients with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks underwent a pure lateral transorbital repair; one patient with skull base fractures from a gunshot wound received a combined transnasal and transorbital repair with a nasoseptal flap through the lateral transorbital corridor. Results: The lateral transorbital approach effectively accessed the lateral sphenoid recess in all patients, allowing repair with standard zero-degree tools while avoiding nasal morbidity and hypesthesia associated with the transpterygoid access. When necessary, an ipsilateral nasoseptal flap can be utilized for complex defects, with placement under direct vision through the lateral transorbital route. The flap provides sufficient length to extend into the lateral corridor up to the temporalis muscle when required. Conclusions: The lateral transorbital approach enhances visualization, reduces nerve injury risk, and lowers nasal morbidity, making it a valuable method for repairing pneumatized sphenoid sinus defects. The nasoseptal flap provides versatile and effective CSF leak prevention in transorbital procedures. Level of Evidence: 4.

Indexed as

lateral transorbital approachnasoseptal flapskull base defectsSternberg canal defecttransorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (TONES)

Identifiers

PMID40061204
PMCPMC11886982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.