ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Trends in spinal implant utilization and pricing.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Measurement and Analysis of Rod Deformation for Spinal Deformity Correction: A Novel Methodology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Shaping the future of spinal implants: advancing bioactive composites with 3D printing for next-generation surgical care.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Preoperative malnutrition is associated with increased postoperative complications following lumbar fusion: a propensity-matched analysis.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Establishing an experimental model approach to thermal-induced spinal cord injury in mice.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Rat Spine Fusion Models for Preclinical Research: Opportunities and Challenges.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The escalation of United States (U.S.) spine surgery volume has been accompanied by considerable advancements in our understanding of spine physiology and technology. Together with implant development over the past decades, these improvements have led to shifts in implant usage. This investigation aimed to elucidate the trends in spinal implant utilization in the U.S. from 2013 to 2022. Materials and Methods: Spine implant utilization and pricing averages between 2013 and 2022 were extracted from Orthopedic Network News. The total sample composed of 664,310 spine procedure purchase orders. Prices were adjusted for inflation based on 2022 prices. Trends were analyzed using linear regression. Results: The U.S. spine procedure volume increased significantly from around 800,000 procedures per year in 2013 to over 1.1 million in 2022, with 73% comprising lumbar and cervical fusions. The proportion of procedures performed in patients over 64 years old increased significantly in both lumbar and cervical cases, constituting 50% and 37% of procedures, respectively. In lumbar spine in 2022, 46% of procedures utilized both pedicle screws (PSs) and interbody devices, 37% PSs only, and 13% interbody devices only. Lumbar PS price decreased significantly to $923 each despite stable lumbar and cervical fusion procedure costs. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and allograft interbody device usage declined while metal increased significantly. Conclusion: Nationwide spine procedure volume rose notably from 2013 to 2022, with the majority constituting lumbar and cervical fusions. The most frequent treatment for a lumbar fusion is a PS construct with an interbody fusion device. Interbody fusion device materials witnessed decline in the use of PEEK and allograft, with metals becoming the preferred material. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.