ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Outcome of spine surgery in the context of spinal metastatic disease: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Literacy, Perception of Health Status, and Access to Healthcare Among Heart Transplant Patients of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Disparities in quality of life and health literacy among patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: the influence of racial and ethnic factors in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2026Article
- Association between preoperative activity levels and postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity surgery.Spine deformity · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Sleep Disturbance and Associated Risk Factors in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sleep Physiology in Spine Disease: A Comparative Study of Cervical and Lumbar Patients.Clinical spine surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal metastases are the third most common site of metastasis, with around 10% of cancer patients experiencing symptomatic spine involvement. Despite poor overall survival, recent advances in targeted therapies and minimally invasive surgical techniques have made surgery a more viable option for managing metastatic spine disease. Objective: Our study aims to identify perioperative risk factors associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery in the setting of spinal cord metastasis. Methods: We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Patients with metastatic spine disease undergoing spine surgery were identified. Our primary outcome measure was 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery. Our secondary outcome was prolonged hospital stay. Logistic regression model for each outcome based on individual characteristics was developed. Results: A total of 2109 patients were included. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 19.1%. Significant predictors included smoking, more than 10% body weight loss, surgical urgency, dependent status, and preoperative albumin levels. In addition, 28.6% of patients experienced a prolonged hospital stay, with significant predictors including chemotherapy, surgical urgency, dependent status, preoperative hematocrit, neurological deficits, preoperative albumin levels, and surgical complexity. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the risk factors associated with mortality, morbidity, and prolonged hospital stay in patients with spinal cord metastasis undergoing spine surgery. These identified factors can be instrumental in assisting clinicians with risk stratification, preoperative optimization, and postoperative care planning, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Further research and validation of these predictive models are warranted to ensure their generalizability and applicability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.