Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061190›Full record

ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine

Outcome of spine surgery in the context of spinal metastatic disease: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Salim M Yakdan, Maya Herrera, Nour Wehbe, Monifa Al Akoum, Muhammad Irfan Kaleem, Miguel A Ruiz-Cardozo, Karan Joseph, Nada Assaf, Hani Dimassi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salim M YakdanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Maya HerreraDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nour WehbeDepartment of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Monifa Al AkoumDepartment of Radiology, Saint George University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Muhammad Irfan KaleemDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Miguel A Ruiz-CardozoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Karan JosephDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nada AssafDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Hani DimassiDepartment of Biostatistics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal metastases are the third most common site of metastasis, with around 10% of cancer patients experiencing symptomatic spine involvement. Despite poor overall survival, recent advances in targeted therapies and minimally invasive surgical techniques have made surgery a more viable option for managing metastatic spine disease. Objective: Our study aims to identify perioperative risk factors associated with poor outcomes following spine surgery in the setting of spinal cord metastasis. Methods: We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Patients with metastatic spine disease undergoing spine surgery were identified. Our primary outcome measure was 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery. Our secondary outcome was prolonged hospital stay. Logistic regression model for each outcome based on individual characteristics was developed. Results: A total of 2109 patients were included. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 19.1%. Significant predictors included smoking, more than 10% body weight loss, surgical urgency, dependent status, and preoperative albumin levels. In addition, 28.6% of patients experienced a prolonged hospital stay, with significant predictors including chemotherapy, surgical urgency, dependent status, preoperative hematocrit, neurological deficits, preoperative albumin levels, and surgical complexity. Conclusion: Our study provides valuable insights into the risk factors associated with mortality, morbidity, and prolonged hospital stay in patients with spinal cord metastasis undergoing spine surgery. These identified factors can be instrumental in assisting clinicians with risk stratification, preoperative optimization, and postoperative care planning, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Further research and validation of these predictive models are warranted to ensure their generalizability and applicability in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Metastasismorbiditymortalityoncologyoutcomesspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID40061190
PMCPMC11888037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.