ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Identify predictive factors for the emergence of self-reported oropharyngeal dysphagia in older men and women populations: a retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic data analysis of inpatient acute geriatric wards in Austria in 2024.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Evaluated by Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Application of intelligent technologies for dysphagia risk prediction: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is an emergent health concern in older adults, with incidence rates escalating due to age-related and various neurological and physical conditions. This study identifies risk and protective factors for new-onset OD, with an emphasis on gender differences. Methods: Utilizing data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), this study analyzed 6,360 participants (58.1% women) across 2011-2014 and 2015-2018 periods. Employing a random forest feature selection, specifically recursive feature elimination and mean decrease impurity algorithm, we assessed 128 variables to identify critical factors including demographics, health, physical and neurological functionality, and environmental conditions. The study further applied logistic regression and explored factor interactions using restricted cubic splines, streamlining the analysis to focus on key determinants of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Results: Initial findings show a decrease in new-onset OD from 15.62% in 2011 to 14.49% in 2015, with women more frequently affected. The analysis elucidates a constellation of highly predictive factors for OD, encompassing extremes of body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic challenges (as indicated by low income), diminished physical conditioning, and adverse emotional states. Notably, gender-specific disparities emerged, highlighting the critical role of cognitive function and mood in men, whereas in women, the overarching influence of general health status and comorbidities was more pronounced. Conclusion: This condensed examination highlights the complex, multifactorial nature of OD in older adults, influenced by sociodemographic, physical, and psychological factors, and underscores the need for gender-specific approaches in predicting, preventing, and managing OD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.