Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40061141›Full record

SynthesisExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2025

Non-targeted effects of stereotactic radiotherapy: a review of the evidence coming from the clinical field.

Angela Barillaro, Mara Caroprese, Chiara Feoli, Emanuele Chioccola, Christina Amanda Goodyear, Caterina Oliviero, Stefania Clemente, Antonio Farella, Manuel Conson, Roberto Pacelli

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela BarillaroDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" School of Medicine, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5085-2322
Mara CaropreseDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" School of Medicine, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-4088
Chiara FeoliDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" School of Medicine, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-6299
Emanuele ChioccolaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging and Time-Dependent Network of Cardiovascular Emergencies, University Hospital "Federico II", 80128 Naples, Italy.
Christina Amanda GoodyearDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging and Time-Dependent Network of Cardiovascular Emergencies, University Hospital "Federico II", 80128 Naples, Italy.
Caterina OlivieroDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital "Federico II", 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5024-8067
Stefania ClementeDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University Hospital "Federico II", 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0717-5183
Antonio FarellaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging and Time-Dependent Network of Cardiovascular Emergencies, University Hospital "Federico II", 80128 Naples, Italy.
Manuel ConsonDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" School of Medicine, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-3656
Roberto PacelliDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" School of Medicine, 80128 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-7675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preclinical animal studies have demonstrated that radiation treatment (RT) can induce effects beyond the anatomical site of irradiation. Non-targeted effects of RT (NTER) have been sporadically reported in clinical settings. However, with the advent of high-dose stereotactic radiation techniques (SRT) and immunotherapy (IT), renewed attention has been given to NTER. This systematic review aims to summarize current knowledge about NTER across various malignancies, with a focus on cases involving SRT. Methods: A systematic database search was performed, and records were screened following PRISMA guidelines. Only full-text original articles written in English and reporting clinical studies involving NTER after SRT were included. The results are categorized by cancer type, with separate general and critical analyses. Results: Sixty-three studies were reviewed, including 32 case reports/case series, 18 retrospective studies, and 13 prospective studies, predominantly published after 2018. NTER was most frequently observed in melanoma and lung cancer and commonly reported as the abscopal effect (AE), albeit with varying criteria. In most cases, IT with suboptimal response was ongoing at the time of SRT, and the median time to NTER onset was 3 months. Overall, NTER was documented in 297 patients: 34 from single cases and 263 from a pool of 1,212 evaluable patients (22%) across other studies. Prospective trials reported an NTER rate of 36%, rising to 56% in lung cancer. Discussion: In prospective clinical studies, the phenomenon of NTER following SRT has been observed in a significant proportion of patients. Nevertheless, the literature is limited, with small patient cohorts. Interest in NTER has grown, particularly in the context of IT. Standardization of definitions and reporting, along with the conduct of more clinical trials, is essential to better understand how NTER can be induced by SRT.

Indexed as

abscopaldistant bystanderimmune responsenon-targeted effectradiosurgeryStereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40061141
PMCPMC11886383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.