ArticleEJIFCC2025
Spreadsheet for Patient-Based Quality Control Analysis and Evaluation (SPAE).
Article in EJIFCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moving percentage of failed delta checks: a novel patient-based quality control model.Biochemia medica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient-based quality control (PBQC) is an alternate quality control technique to conventional (internal) quality control. It uses patient results generated for clinical care to monitor the analytical performance through statistical analysis. The use of PBQC in routine laboratory is impeded by lack of familiarity and appropriate informatics tool. Method: A Spreadsheet for PBQC Analysis and Evaluation (SPAE, based on Microsoft Excel) is developed. It incorporates IFCC recommended features for PBQC informatics tool that has been automated, including data visualization, data (Box-Cox) transformation, extreme value treatment (winsorization) and user parameter selection (block size, acceptable false positive rate, desirable bias for detection). Results: Following parameter selection and data input, the spreadsheet automatically calculates the winsorization limits, transformed values, performance verification metrics such as false positive rates and number of results affected before error detection (NPed) - a performance metric for how sensitive the PBQC model detects the predefined error (bias). The verified PBQC model can be used for routine monitoring. The performance of the spreadsheet tool was verified against an independent model based on Python. Laboratory users can download the tool at https://github.com/HuiQi96/PBQC/blob/main/PBQC_model_v2.2.zip. Discussion: The SPAE is a simple-to-use desktop tool that lowers the barrier for laboratory users to adopt PBQC in their quality control system. In addition, the spreadsheet can be used as an educational tool, such as when conducting a workshop, to help laboratory users better familiarize themselves with the PBQC concepts and used for independent verification of the output of another informatics tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40061063PMC11886628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.