ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals in implementing an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paving the Way for ERAS in German Gynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Departments: Insights into Barriers, Facilitators and Practical Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced recovery after breast surgery: a review of international evidence and nursing challenges in China.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: ERAS protocols have revolutionized perioperative care by optimizing patient outcomes after major surgeries. Despite widespread recognition in various surgical specialties, the implementation of ERAS in cardiac surgery remains relatively novel. Methods: This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to explore the perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals involved in ERAS implementation, focusing on identifying facilitators and barriers. The data collected from the interviews was subjected to qualitative content analysis to identify emerging themes and patterns. Results: The emerged themes highlight the importance of effective communication, interprofessional collaboration, and clear guidelines in facilitating ERAS implementation. While healthcare professionals universally recognized the benefits of ERAS for patient outcomes, they also identified challenges such as time constraints and resource allocation. Conclusion: The study emphasizes the need for effective communication, interprofessional collaboration, and clear guidelines to overcome the challenges of implementing ERAS. The importance of involving diverse healthcare professionals in ERAS development and implementation to enhance team spirit, motivation, and overall success is highlighted by our findings. These findings contribute to the ongoing refinement of ERAS protocols, ultimately improving patient outcomes in cardiac surgery and beyond. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, collaboration across institutions, and exploration of implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.