Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060949›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025

Optimizing drug sensitivity assays in patient-derived tumor organoids: a comparison of IC50 estimation methods and experimental parameters.

Yidan Chen, Jian Zhang, Bin Zhang, Hong Kai Lee, Suyao Xie, Wei Shen, Xueqin Chen, Mingliang You, Chongyang Shen, Bing Xia and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yidan ChenHangzhou Cancer Institute, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang 310006, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China.
Hong Kai LeeDepartment of R&D, Hangzhou AimingMed Technologies Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China.
Suyao XieDepartment of R&D, Hangzhou AimingMed Technologies Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China.
Wei ShenDepartment of R&D, Hangzhou AimingMed Technologies Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China.
Xueqin ChenDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China.
Mingliang YouDepartment of R&D, Hangzhou AimingMed Technologies Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China.
Chongyang ShenDepartment of R&D, Hangzhou AimingMed Technologies Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 310000, China.
Bing XiaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China.
Huayang XingHangzhou Cancer Institute, Hangzhou Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310002, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9455-3296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived tumor organoids (PDOs) hold immense potential for personalized drug sensitivity testing, but accurate efficacy determination is crucial for clinical translation. This study investigated factors influencing the accuracy and reproducibility of drug sensitivity measurements in PDOs, focusing on half-maximal-inhibitory-concentration (IC50) calculation methods, drug concentration numbers, and plate types. PDOs were established from six primary cancer tissues, including two cervical resections, one lung biopsy, one lung pleural effusion, one breast biopsy, and one gastric resection. They were subjected to drug sensitivity assays with 21 single/combined treatments, encompassing chemotherapy and targeted therapy drugs, with concentrations standardized in fold. Utilizing 6- and 12-concentration setups, IC50 derived from GraphPad-Dose-response-Inhibition (DRI), LC-logit, and LC-probit methods were compared. Relative changes (RCs) in IC50 and area-under-the dose-response-curve (AUC) between setups and the impact of plate type on cell viability measurements were assessed. In the 12-concentration setup, no significant IC50 differences were observed among the calculation methods. Notably, GraphPad-DRI and LC-logit exhibited minimal RCs between the 6- and 12-concentration setups (0.035 and -0.033, respectively), indicating accurate IC50 quantification even with fewer drug concentrations. AUC correlated strongly with GraphPad-DRI-derived IC50 (R = 0.858) and demonstrated lower variance between technical replicates. Furthermore, opaque-bottom plates yielded higher precision in cell viability measurements compared to transparent-bottom plates. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing drug sensitivity testing in PDOs. By demonstrating the robustness of specific IC50 calculation methods and the feasibility of using fewer drug concentrations, this study contributed to the standardization and reliability of PDO-based drug sensitivity assays.

Indexed as

AUCcancerconcentrationdosedrugIC50organoidresponsesensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40060949
PMCPMC11890276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.