ArticleACS omega2025
Evolution of the Pore-Fracture System of Coal: A Case Study of Zhaozhuang Colliery, Qinshui Basin.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The structure and evolution of coal are intricately linked to its properties at both nanometer and micrometer scales. The refinement of pores and fractures is crucial for assessing outburst risks, evaluating coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs, and improving the CBM recovery efficiency. This study involved collecting four different coal-body structure samples from the Zhaozhuang colliery in the southern Qinshui Basin. We conducted laboratory analyses to determine the physical properties of the coal and employed X-ray computed tomography (CT) to quantitatively assess the pore size distribution (PSD), volume contribution, morphology, and connectivity across various coal structures. The evolution and comparative characteristics of these coal structures under different tectonic stresses is discussed. Results reveal that the hysteresis loop type of 3# anthracite primarily aligns with the H3 type as per IUPAC classification, featuring predominantly plate-like and wedge-shaped pores at the nanometer scale. A shape factor was introduced to quantitatively categorize the pore types, highlighting its sensitivity to the coal structure. Spherical and tubular pores are mainly present in the aperture range of 0-25 μm, while larger apertures appeared as prolate spheroids and flat fractures. Primary coal contains more spherical or tubular pores, whereas tectonic coal shows a prevalence of slit pores and flat fractures, suggesting that pores and fractures undergo progressive deformation, either breaking or elongating, under tectonic stress. The elastic property is affected by the multifactor of the increased pore volume and changes in pore morphology. Permeability is influenced by PSD and connectivity, demonstrating a quadratic positive correlation with porosity, aperture, and specific surface area. Granular coal exhibited the most favorable permeability characteristics for CBM extraction. The distribution trend of morphology and comprehensive data highlight an evolutionary pattern of different coal structures. The evolution of the coal structure is mainly shaped by brittle and ductile deformation mechanisms. Cataclastic coal is characterized by an increase in new fractures, and granular coal undergoes rapid new fracture formation and enhanced connectivity under strong stress conditions. Mylonitic coal develops under ductile deformation mechanisms. These insights into the properties of various coal structures can significantly enhance our understanding of the CBM recovery efficiency from both microscopic and mesoscopic perspectives.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.