Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060767›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025

Recent regulatory developments in EU Medical Device Regulation and their impact on biomaterials translation.

Klaudia M Jurczak, Torben A B van der Boon, Raul Devia-Rodriguez, Richte C L Schuurmann, Jelmer Sjollema, Lidia van Huizen, Jean-Paul P M De Vries, Patrick van Rijn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Klaudia M JurczakBiomaterials and Biomedical Technology Department-FB40 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Torben A B van der BoonBiomaterials and Biomedical Technology Department-FB40 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Raul Devia-RodriguezDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Richte C L SchuurmannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Jelmer SjollemaBiomaterials and Biomedical Technology Department-FB40 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Lidia van HuizenQuality and Safety University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Jean-Paul P M De VriesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Patrick van RijnBiomaterials and Biomedical Technology Department-FB40 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2208-5725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We envision this work to assist researchers and medical device developers (beside other stakeholders) to better understand biomaterial-based medical device development and its approval process proposed by the new MDR and IVDR in the European Union, as more complex biomaterials emerge, with the MDR reflecting the progress in biomaterial discoveries. Additionally, insufficient international harmonization in regulatory laws and poor-quality data reporting contribute to the problem. This review describes the possible reasons for a slowing biomaterials translational trend observed over the past decades, focusing on the European Market, and suggests a feasible approach for biomaterials-based medical device translation into the clinic. Suitable solutions to upgrade biomaterial translation to the clinic have not yet been provided by the field: no additional hurdles should be imposed for researchers, clinicians, the medical device industry, and insurance companies, which all should collaborate on bringing innovative solutions to patients. The new MDR and IVDR represent a substantial advancement in ensuring patient safety and reflect a major step forward in healthcare. However, they should not constrain innovation in biomaterials-based medical device development. Incorporating reverse engineering from patient safety and a 'safe by design' (SbD) strategy early into medical device development might lead to a smoother and successful approval process. A solid R&D phase, with an emphasis on device safety and performance assessment, is fundamental to ensure an effective transition into the clinic. We offer an overview of the recently implemented regulations on medical devices and in vitro diagnostics across the EU, describing a shifting paradigm in the field of biomaterials discovery. As more complex biomaterials emerge, suitable regulations will be necessary to keep bringing safe and well-performing medical solutions to patients.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbiomaterials clinical translationIn Vitro Diagnostic RegulationMedical Device Regulationmedical devices

Identifiers

PMID40060767
PMCPMC11883120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.