Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060757›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2025

Advances in bioengineered CAR T/NK cell therapy for glioblastoma: Overcoming immunosuppression and nanotechnology-based strategies for enhanced CAR T/NK cell therapy.

Nasim Dana, Arezou Dabiri, Majed Bahri Najafi, Azadeh Rahimi, Sayed Mohammad Matin Ishaghi, Laleh Shariati, Minmin Shao, Assunta Borzacchiello, Ilnaz Rahimmanesh, Pooyan Makvandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting the COX-2/PGECancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nasim DanaApplied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Arezou DabiriApplied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Majed Bahri NajafiApplied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Azadeh RahimiApplied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Sayed Mohammad Matin IshaghiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of biological science and technology The University of Isfahan Isfahan Iran.
Laleh ShariatiDepartment of Biomaterials, Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.
Minmin ShaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The Dingli Clinical College affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou Central Hospital Wenzhou 325000 China.
Assunta BorzacchielloInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials National Research Council (IPCB-CNR) Naples Italy.
Ilnaz RahimmaneshApplied Physiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3438-1959
Pooyan MakvandiThe Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Quzhou People's Hospital Zhejiang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-0961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a strong challenge in the worldwide field of central nervous system malignancies. GBM's inherent heterogeneity, along with the formation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, supports its resistance to current therapy methods. Immunotherapeutic methods have emerged as potential options in recent years. However, because of the inherent limits of traditional immunotherapeutic techniques innovative approaches are required. Advances in cut-edge techniques provide a possible route for improving effector cell effectiveness. This review gives insight into the complicated immunosuppressive pathways in GBM, with a particular emphasis on CAR T/NK-cell treatment as a potential achievement. Recognizing and addressing these concerns might open the way for more effective and focused glioblastoma therapies, providing hope for the future with the aim of improved outcomes for patients. In addition, this review presents valuable insights into the integration of nanotechnology into CAR T/NK cell therapy for enhanced efficiency of these personalized gene therapy products.

Indexed as

cell therapychimeric antigen receptorsglioblastoma multiformenanotechnologytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40060757
PMCPMC11883117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.