ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Stacking models of brain dynamics to improve prediction of subject traits in fMRI.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beyond structural and time-averaged functional connectivity brain measures, modelling the way brain activity dynamically unfolds can add important information to our understanding and characterisation of individual cognitive traits. One approach to leveraging this information is to extract features from models of brain network dynamics to predict individual traits. However, these predictions are susceptible to variability due to factors such as variation in model estimation induced by the choice of hyperparameters. We suggest that, rather than merely being statistical noise, this variability may be useful in providing complementary information that can be leveraged to improve prediction accuracy. To leverage this variability, we propose the use of stacking, a prediction-driven approach for model selection. Specifically, we combine predictions developed from multiple hidden Markov models-a probabilistic generative model of network dynamics that identifies recurring patterns of brain activity-to demonstrate that stacking can slightly improve the accuracy and robustness of cognitive trait predictions. By comparing analysis from the Human Connectome Project and UK Biobank datasets, we show that stacking is relatively effective at improving prediction accuracy and robustness when there are enough subjects, and that the effectiveness of combining predictions from static and dynamic functional connectivity approaches depends on the length of scan per subject. We also show that the effectiveness of stacking predictions is driven by the accuracy and diversity in the underlying model estimations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.