ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2025
Current role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the management of trauma patients: Indications and results.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergency preservation and resuscitation in exsanguination cardiac arrest: science fiction to future reality?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
- A place for everything… and everything in its place?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves survival for trauma patients: fact, fiction, or the future?Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a vital circulatory life support measure for patients with critical cardiac or pulmonary conditions unresponsive to conventional therapies. ECMO allows blood to be extracted from a patient and introduced to a machine that oxygenates blood and removes carbon dioxide. This blood is then reintroduced into the patient's circulatory system. This process makes ECMO essential for treating various medical conditions, both as a standalone therapy and as adjuvant therapy. Veno-venous (VV) ECMO primarily supports respiratory function and indicates respiratory distress. Simultaneously, veno-arterial (VA) ECMO provides hemodynamic and respiratory support and is suitable for cardiac-related complications. This study reviews recent literature to elucidate the evolving role of ECMO in trauma care, considering its procedural intricacies, indications, contraindications, and associated complications. Notably, the use of ECMO in trauma patients, particularly for acute respiratory distress syndrome and cardiogenic shock, has demonstrated promising outcomes despite challenges such as anticoagulation management and complications such as acute kidney injury, bleeding, thrombosis, and hemolysis. Some studies have shown that VV ECMO was associated with significantly higher survival rates than conventional mechanical ventilation, whereas other studies have reported that VA ECMO was associated with lower survival rates than VV ECMO. ECMO plays a critical role in managing trauma patients, particularly those with acute respiratory failure. Further research is necessary to explore the full potential of ECMO in trauma care. Clinicians should have a clear understanding of the indications and contraindications for the use of ECMO to maximize its benefits in treating trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.