Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060728›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Evaluating Three Modelling Frameworks for Assessing Changes in Fin Whale Distribution in the Mediterranean Sea.

Francesca Grossi, Elliott L Hazen, Giulio De Leo, Léa David, Nathalie Di-Méglio, Antonella Arcangeli, Eugenia Pasanisi, Ilaria Campana, Miriam Paraboschi, Alberto Castelli and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Francesca GrossiCIMA Research Foundation Savona Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1949-2802
Elliott L HazenEcosystem Science Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center Monterey California USA.
Giulio De LeoHopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology Stanford University Pacific Grove California USA.
Léa DavidEcoOcéan Institut Montpellier France.
Nathalie Di-MéglioEcoOcéan Institut Montpellier France.
Antonella ArcangeliDepartment for Biodiversity Conservation and Monitoring ISPRA Rome Italy.
Eugenia PasanisiDepartment for Biodiversity Conservation and Monitoring ISPRA Rome Italy.
Ilaria CampanaAccademia del Leviatano Maccarese Italy.
Miriam ParaboschiAccademia del Leviatano Maccarese Italy.
Alberto CastelliUniversity of Pisa Pisa Italy.
Massimiliano RossoCIMA Research Foundation Savona Italy.
Aurelie MoulinsCIMA Research Foundation Savona Italy.
Paola TepsichCIMA Research Foundation Savona Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the habitat of highly migratory species is aided by using species distribution models to identify species-habitat relationships and to inform conservation and management plans. While Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) are commonly used in ecology, and particularly the habitat modeling of marine mammals, there remains a debate between modeling habitat (presence/absence) versus density (# individuals). Our study assesses the performance and predictive capabilities of GAMs compared to boosted regression trees (BRTs) for modeling both fin whale density and habitat suitability alongside Hurdle Models treating presence/absence and density as a two-stage process to address the challenge of zero-inflated data. Fin whale data were collected from 2008 to 2022 along fixed transects crossing the NW Mediterranean Sea during the summer period. Data were analyzed using traditional line transect methodology, obtaining the Effective Area monitored. Based on existing literature, we select various covariates, either static in nature, such as bathymetry and slope, or variable in time, for example, SST, MLD, Chl concentration, EKE, and FSLE. We compared both the explanatory power and predictive skill of the different modeling techniques. Our results show that all models performed well in distinguishing presences and absences but, while density and presence patterns for the fin whale were similar, their dependencies on environmental factors can vary depending on the chosen model. Bathymetry was the most important variable in all models, followed by SST and the chlorophyll recorded 2 months before the sighting. This study underscores the role SDMs can play in marine mammal conservation efforts and emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate modeling techniques. It also quantifies the relationship between environmental variables and fin whale distribution in an understudied area, providing a solid foundation for informed decision making and spatial management.

Indexed as

BRTfin whaleGAMhabitat modelhurdle modelMediterranean Sea

Identifiers

PMID40060728
PMCPMC11886417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.