ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Territoriality Modulates the Effect of Conspecific Encounters on the Foraging Behaviours of a Mammalian Predator.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Rub Tree Prediction to Targeted Genetic Sampling in Brown Bears: Linking Scent-Marking Ecology and Spatial Modelling.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The probability of encountering conspecifics shapes animal behaviour, particularly for territorial individuals which often increase vigilance and scent marking when approaching home range boundaries. However, whether the foraging behaviours of territorial predators also vary with the probability of encountering neighbouring territory owners is poorly understood. We monitored 23 Arctic foxes occupying neighbouring home ranges during 2 years of contrasting resource availability on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada. First, based on simultaneous GPS tracking of individuals, we established which individuals used a territory by estimating the spatial distribution of the probability of encountering a neighbour within their home range. Second, using GPS and accelerometry data, we evaluated if the probability of encountering a neighbour influenced foraging behaviours, and whether this relationship differed between territorial and non-territorial individuals. When resources were abundant, only breeding individuals excluded other foxes from a part of their home range and were thus territorial. When resources were rare, none of the foxes reproduced, and all but one were territorial. Non-territorial individuals were less likely to cache prey in areas with a high probability of encounter, possibly to reduce cache pilfering. Territorial individuals were slightly more likely to cache prey as the probability of encountering neighbours increased, suggesting that they do not actively avoid interactions while foraging. We suggest Arctic foxes use different tactics to secure resources based on their degree of territoriality. The presence of non-territorial predators, whose home ranges overlap those of territorial neighbours, may influence the distribution of predation risk by creating zones where predator density is high, potentially influencing predator-prey interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.