ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
ERC 2.0 - evolutionary rate covariation update improves inference of functional interactions across large phylogenies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evolutionary Rate Covariation (ERC) is an established comparative genomics method that identifies sets of genes sharing patterns of sequence evolution, which suggests shared function. Whereas many functional predictions of ERC have been empirically validated, its predictive power has hitherto been limited by its inability to tackle the large numbers of species in contemporary comparative genomics datasets. This study introduces ERC2.0, an enhanced methodology for studying ERC across phylogenies with hundreds of species and tens of thousands of genes. ERC2.0 improves upon previous iterations of ERC in algorithm speed, normalizing for heteroskedasticity, and normalizing correlations via Fisher transformations. These improvements have resulted in greater statistical power to predict biological function. In exemplar yeast and mammalian datasets, we demonstrate that the predictive power of ERC2.0 is improved relative to the previous method, ERC1.0, and that further improvements are obtained by using larger yeast and mammalian phylogenies. We attribute the improvements to both the larger datasets and improved rate normalization. We demonstrate that ERC2.0 has high predictive accuracy for known annotations and can predict the functions of genes in non-model systems. Our findings underscore the potential for ERC2.0 to be used as a single-pass computational tool in candidate gene screening and functional predictions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.