ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Inferring active mutational processes in cancer using single cell sequencing and evolutionary constraints.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ongoing mutagenesis in cancer drives genetic diversity throughout the natural history of cancers. As the activities of mutational processes are dynamic throughout evolution, distinguishing the mutational signatures of 'active' and 'historical' processes has important implications for studying how tumors evolve. This can aid in understanding mutagenic states at the time of presentation, and in associating active mutational process with therapeutic resistance. As bulk sequencing primarily captures historical mutational processes, we studied whether ultra-low-coverage single-cell whole-genome sequencing (scWGS), which measures the distribution of mutations across hundreds or thousands of individual cells, could enable the distinction between historical and active mutational processes. While technical challenges and data sparsity have limited mutation analysis in scWGS, we show that these data contain valuable information about dynamic mutational processes. To robustly interpret single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in scWGS, we introduce ArtiCull, a method to identify and remove SNV artifacts by leveraging evolutionary constraints, enabling reliable detection of mutations for signature analysis. Applying this approach to scWGS data from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), we uncover temporal and spatial patterns in mutational processes. In PDAC, we observe a temporal increase in mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). In cisplatin-treated TNBC patient-derived xenografts, we identify therapy-induced mutagenesis and inactivation of APOBEC3 activity. In HGSOC, we show distinct patterns of APOBEC3 mutagenesis, including late tumor-wide activation in one case and clade-specific enrichment in another. Additionally, we detect a clone-specific increase in SBS17 activity, in a clone previously linked to recurrence. Our findings establish ultra-low-coverage scWGS as a powerful approach for studying active mutational processes that may influence ongoing clonal evolution and therapeutic resistance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.