ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Interdigitating Modules for Visual Processing During Locomotion and Rest in Mouse V1.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Layer 1 of V1 has been shown to receive locomotion-related signals from the dorsal lateral geniculate (dLGN) and lateral posterior (LP) thalamic nuclei (Roth et al., 2016). Inputs from the dLGN terminate in M2+ patches while inputs from LP target M2- interpatches (D'Souza et al., 2019) suggesting that motion related signals are processed in distinct networks. Here, we investigated by calcium imaging in head-fixed awake mice whether L2/3 neurons underneath L1 M2+ and M2- modules are differentially activated by locomotion, and whether distinct networks of feedback connections from higher cortical areas to L1 may contribute to these differences. We found that strongly locomotion-modulated cell clusters during visual stimulation were aligned with M2- interpatches, while weakly modulated cells clustered under M2+ patches. Unlike M2+ patch cells, pairs of M2- interpatch cells showed increased correlated variability of calcium transients when the sites in the visuotopic map were far apart, suggesting that activity is integrated across large parts of the visual field. Pathway tracing further suggests that strong locomotion modulation in L2/3 M2- interpatch cells of V1 relies on looped, like-to-like networks between apical dendrites of MOs-, PM- and RSP-projecting neurons and feedback input from these areas to L1. M2- interpatches receive strong inputs from SST neurons, suggesting that during locomotion these interneurons influence the firing of specific subnetworks by controlling the excitability of apical dendrites in M2- interpatches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.