ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Data retention in awake infant fMRI: Lessons from more than 750 scanning sessions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in awake infants has the potential to reveal how the early developing brain gives rise to cognition and behavior. However, awake infant fMRI poses significant methodological challenges that have hampered wider adoption. The present work takes stock after the collection of a substantial amount of awake infant fMRI data across multiple studies from two labs at different institutions. We leveraged these data to glean insights on participant recruitment, experimental design, and data acquisition that could be useful to consider for future studies. Across 766 awake infant fMRI sessions, we explored the factors that influenced how much usable data were obtained per session (average of 9 minutes). The age of an infant predicted whether they would successfully enter the scanner (younger was more likely) and, if they did enter, the number of minutes of functional data retained after preprocessing. The amount of functional data retained was also influenced by assigned sex (female more), experimental paradigm (movies better than blocks and events), and stimulus content (social better than abstract). In addition, we assessed the value of attempting to collect multiple experiments per session, an approach that yielded more than one usable experiment averaging across all sessions (including those with no data). Although any given scan is unpredictable, these findings support the feasibility of awake infant fMRI and suggest practices to optimize future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.