Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060474›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Within-Individual Precision Mapping of Brain Networks Exclusively Using Task Data.

Jingnan Du, Maxwell L Elliott, Joanna Ladopoulou, Mark C Eldaief, Randy L Buckner

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingnan DuDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1647-6698
Maxwell L ElliottDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1083-6277
Joanna LadopoulouDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8012-7710
Mark C EldaiefDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4919-2897
Randy L BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6422-8037

Funding

Precision Mapping the Human Cerebellum for Neuromodulation and Understanding of Brain DisordersR01MH124004 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L, POLIMENI, JONATHAN RIZZO · 2020 to 2022
$1.8M
Upgrade Siemens MAGNETOM Trio to MAGNETOM Prisma Fit 3T Human MRI SystemS10OD020039 · OD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2015 to 2015
$600k
Training in lifespan behavioral, social, and neuroscience research connecting early-life cognitive decline to late-life ADRDK00AG068432 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIOTT, MAXWELL LORENZ · 2022 to 2025
$319k
NIA NIH HHS K00 AG068432NIH HHS S10 OD020039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision mapping of brain networks within individuals has become a widely used tool that prevailingly relies on functional connectivity analysis of resting-state data. Here we explored whether networks could be precisely estimated solely using data acquired during active task paradigms. The straightforward strategy involved extracting residualized data after application of a task-based general linear model (GLM) and then applying standard functional connectivity analysis. Functional correlation matrices estimated from task data were highly similar to those derived from traditional resting-state fixation data. The largest factor affecting similarity between correlation matrices was the amount of data. Networks estimated within-individual from task data displayed strong spatial overlap with those estimated from resting-state fixation data and predicted the same triple functional dissociation in independent data. The implications of these findings are that (1) existing task data can be reanalyzed to estimate within-individual network organization, (2) resting-state fixation and task data can be pooled to increase statistical power, and (3) future studies can exclusively acquire task data to both estimate networks and extract task responses. Most broadly, the present results suggest that there is an underlying, stable network architecture that is idiosyncratic to the individual and persists across task states.

Identifiers

PMID40060474
PMCPMC11888310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.