ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Within-Individual Precision Mapping of Brain Networks Exclusively Using Task Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision mapping of brain networks within individuals has become a widely used tool that prevailingly relies on functional connectivity analysis of resting-state data. Here we explored whether networks could be precisely estimated solely using data acquired during active task paradigms. The straightforward strategy involved extracting residualized data after application of a task-based general linear model (GLM) and then applying standard functional connectivity analysis. Functional correlation matrices estimated from task data were highly similar to those derived from traditional resting-state fixation data. The largest factor affecting similarity between correlation matrices was the amount of data. Networks estimated within-individual from task data displayed strong spatial overlap with those estimated from resting-state fixation data and predicted the same triple functional dissociation in independent data. The implications of these findings are that (1) existing task data can be reanalyzed to estimate within-individual network organization, (2) resting-state fixation and task data can be pooled to increase statistical power, and (3) future studies can exclusively acquire task data to both estimate networks and extract task responses. Most broadly, the present results suggest that there is an underlying, stable network architecture that is idiosyncratic to the individual and persists across task states.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.