ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Topologically Optimized Intrinsic Brain Networks.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The estimation of brain networks is instrumental in quantifying and evaluating brain function. Nevertheless, achieving precise estimations of subject-level networks has proven to be a formidable task. In response to this challenge, researchers have developed group-inference frameworks that leverage robust group-level estimations as a common reference point to infer corresponding subject-level networks. Generally, existing approaches either leverage the common reference as a strict, voxel-wise spatial constraint (i.e., strong constraints at the voxel level) or impose no constraints. Here, we propose a targeted approach that harnesses the topological information of group-level networks to encode a high-level representation of spatial properties to be used as constraints, which we refer to as Topologically Optimized Intrinsic Brain Networks (TOIBN). Consequently, our method inherits the significant advantages of constraint-based approaches, such as enhancing estimation efficacy in noisy data or small sample sizes. On the other hand, our method provides a softer constraint than voxel-wise penalties, which can result in the loss of individual variation, increased susceptibility to model biases, and potentially missing important subject-specific information. Our analyses show that the subject maps from our method are less noisy and true to the group networks while promoting subject variability that can be lost from strict constraints. We also find that the topological properties resulting from the TOIBN maps are more expressive of differences between individuals with schizophrenia and controls in the default mode, subcortical, and visual networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.