Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060429›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Computational modeling of human genetic variants in mice.

Kexin Dong, Samuel I Gould, Minghang Li, Francisco J Sánchez Rivera

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kexin DongDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-3890
Samuel I GouldDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-5215
Minghang LiDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-2639-0741
Francisco J Sánchez RiveraDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8466-8563

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Jacqueline A. Lees · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Pre-doctoral Training in Fundamental Approaches to Biochemistry and Cell and Molecular BiologyT32GM136540 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Mary Gehring, Michael Laub · 2021 to 2026
$9.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse models represent a powerful platform to study genes and variants associated with human diseases. While genome editing technologies have increased the rate and precision of model development, predicting and installing specific types of mutations in mice that mimic the native human genetic context is complicated. Computational tools can identify and align orthologous wild-type genetic sequences from different species; however, predictive modeling and engineering of equivalent mouse variants that mirror the nucleotide and/or polypeptide change effects of human variants remains challenging. Here, we present H2M (human-to-mouse), a computational pipeline to analyze human genetic variation data to systematically model and predict the functional consequences of equivalent mouse variants. We show that H2M can integrate mouse-to-human and paralog-to-paralog variant mapping analyses with precision genome editing pipelines to devise strategies tailored to model specific variants in mice. We leveraged these analyses to establish a database containing > 3 million human-mouse equivalent mutation pairs, as well as

Identifiers

PMID40060429
PMCPMC11888284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.