Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060416›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Consequences of training data composition for deep learning models in single-cell biology.

Ajay Nadig, Akshaya Thoutam, Madeline Hughes, Anay Gupta, Andrew W Navia, Nicolo Fusi, Srivatsan Raghavan, Peter S Winter, Ava P Amini, Lorin Crawford

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ajay NadigHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Akshaya ThoutamMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Madeline HughesMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anay GuptaGeorgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andrew W NaviaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicolo FusiMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Srivatsan RaghavanHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Peter S WinterBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ava P AminiMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8601-6040
Lorin CrawfordMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0178-8242

Funding

Regulation and targeting of tumor cell states and plasticity in pancreatic cancerK08CA260442 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Srivatsan Raghavan · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA260442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation models for single-cell transcriptomics have the potential to augment (or replace) purpose-built tools for a variety of common analyses, especially when data are sparse. Recent work with large language models has shown that training data composition greatly shapes performance; however, to date, single-cell foundation models have ignored this aspect, opting instead to train on the largest possible corpus. We systematically investigate the consequences of training dataset composition on the behavior of deep learning models of single-cell transcriptomics, focusing on human hematopoiesis as a tractable model system and including cells from adult and developing tissues, disease states, and perturbation atlases. We find that (1) these models generalize poorly to unseen cell types, (2) adding malignant cells to a healthy cell training corpus does not necessarily improve modeling of unseen malignant cells, and (3) including an embryonic stem cell differentiation atlas during training improves performance on out-of-distribution tasks. Our results emphasize the importance of diverse training data and suggest strategies to optimize future single-cell foundation models.

Identifiers

PMID40060416
PMCPMC11888162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.