Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060396›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

To pack or not to pack: revisiting protein side-chain packing in the post-AlphaFold era.

Sriniketh Vangaru, Debswapna Bhattacharya

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sriniketh VangaruDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, Virginia, USA.
Debswapna BhattacharyaDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 24061, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9630-0141

Funding

GPU-accelerated high-performance computing to supercharge foundational deep learning method development for scalable and accurate prediction of protein structuresR35GM138146 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI Debswapna Bhattacharya · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Protein side-chain packing (PSCP), the problem of predicting side-chain conformation given a fixed backbone structure, has important implications in modeling of structures and interactions. However, despite the groundbreaking progress in protein structure prediction pioneered by AlphaFold, the existing PSCP methods still rely on experimental inputs, and do not leverage AlphaFold-predicted backbone coordinates to enable PSCP at scale. Results: Here, we perform a large-scale benchmarking of the predictive performance of various PSCP methods on public datasets from multiple rounds of the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) challenges using a diverse set of evaluation metrics. Empirical results demonstrate that the PSCP methods perform well in packing the side-chains with experimental inputs, but they fail to generalize in repacking AlphaFold-generated structures. We additionally explore the effectiveness of leveraging the self-assessment confidence scores from AlphaFold by implementing a backbone confidence-aware integrative approach. While such a protocol often leads to performance improvement by attaining modest yet statistically significant accuracy gains over the AlphaFold baseline, it does not yield consistent and pronounced improvements. Our study highlights the recent advances and remaining challenges in PSCP in the post-AlphaFold era. Availability: The code and raw data are freely available at https://github.com/Bhattacharya-Lab/PackBench.

Indexed as

molecular modelingperformance benchmarkingprotein side-chain packingprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID40060396
PMCPMC11888329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.