ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Real-world andexanet alfa utilization and the association between delay in administration due to hospital transfer and all-cause inpatient mortality.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Coagulation Biomarker Profiles After Andexanet Alfa Use for Procedure-Related Cardiac Tamponade.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evaluations of andexanet alfa for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor-associated bleeding have been small, with cohorts drawn from single/limited sites. Delays in providing anticoagulation reversal due to hospital transfer may result in poorer outcomes. Objectives: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of andexanet alfa users and evaluate the association between delay in andexanet alfa administration due to transfer from a different acute care hospital and the incidence of all-cause inpatient mortality. Methods: This was a retrospective study using National Inpatient Sample data. Hospitalizations with procedural codes for andexanet alfa and a billing code for bleeding were included. Descriptive analysis was performed, as was multivariable logistic regression, to estimate the odds ratio and 95% CI for the association between andexanet alfa delayed due to transfer from a different acute care hospital and all-cause inpatient mortality. Results: From 2019 to 2021, 4210 hospitalizations occurred in adults receiving andexanet alfa and a bleed. Most were hospitalized with intracranial hemorrhage (62.0%). The incidence of all-cause inpatient mortality was 16.6% (95% CI, 14.3%-19.3%), mean hospital stays lasted 9.1 days (95% CI, 8.4-9.8), and mean hospital costs were $73,600 (95% CI, $65,000-$82,200). Of all cases, 18.5% were transferred from a different acute care hospital prior to receiving andexanet alfa. Cases with hospital transfer had an 82% increased odds of all-cause inpatient mortality (95% CI, 17%-183%) but did not reach statistical significance when the population was limited to intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.88-2.60). Conclusion: Delay in administering andexanet alfa due to hospital transfer may be associated with increased all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.