Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060353›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2024

Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Real-World Recommendations.

Purvish M Parikh, Ankur Bahl, Gopal Sharma, Raja Pramanik, Jyoti Wadhwa, Peush Bajpai, Sunny Jandyal, A P Dubey, Aditya Sarin, Subash Chandra Dadhich and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Purvish M ParikhDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Sri Ram Cancer Center, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Ankur BahlDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Gopal SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Max Healthcare Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Raja PramanikDepartment of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Jyoti WadhwaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Peush BajpaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manipal Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Sunny JandyalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Action Cancer Hospital, New Delhi, India.
A P DubeyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Delhi Heart and Lung Institute, New Delhi, India.
Aditya SarinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Subash Chandra DadhichDepartment of Laparoscopic Surgery, Arogya Hospital, Vizag, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Avinash P SaklaniDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ashok KumarDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Abhijit ChandraDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Saumitra RawatDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
C SelvasekarClinical Services and Specialist Surgery, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Shyam AggarwalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic CRC is considered as a heterogenous disease. Its management is therefore complex and dynamic. In order the give a ready reference to community oncologists, we developed this real world recommendations. Methods: A group of experts with academic background and real world experience in mCRC got together. We reviewed the current literature and the insights gained from our real world experience. Based on the same we put together these recommendations. Recommendations Results: Molecular testing should be done wherever possible. Most of these patients will be treated with a palliative approach. Doublet chemotherapy is a long-standing standard of care. Triplet therapy may be offered where a more aggressive approach is indicated. Combination with anti -vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies and/or anti EGFR antibodies is also considered standard. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab can be used for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumours; Left and right sided tumours are distinct entities. Combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy is used as per individual patient and tumour characteristics.Oligometastatic disease can be approached with potentially curative intent. Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy can be offered to selected patients with peritoneal only metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy can be used as local therapy for patients with oligometastatic liver only disease who cannot be taken up for surgery. New strategies include induction-maintenance chemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy. All drugs/ regimen included as standard of care in the first line can also be used in subsequent lines. Specific targetable driver mutation tumours can be treated accordingly with their complementary biological therapy. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are possible when patient and caregivers choose to become active participants.

Indexed as

aggressive canceroverall survivalpersonalized oncologysystemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID40060353
PMCPMC11888815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.