Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40060340›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2024

Screening for Colorectal Carcinoma in India: Real-World Scenario, Pitfalls, and Solutions.

Mansi Agrawal, Adwaith Krishna Surendran, Karthik Kanna Venkatesh, Praveen Nandha Kumar Pitchan Velammal, Sarvesh Zope, Anika Goel, Aarnav Pathak, Mallika Mittal, Varshitha K K, Archana Sameer Vinakar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mansi AgrawalMedical Student, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Adwaith Krishna SurendranMedical Student, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Karthik Kanna VenkateshMedical Student, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Praveen Nandha Kumar Pitchan VelammalMedical Student, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sarvesh ZopeAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anika GoelMedical Student, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal, Telangana, India.
Aarnav PathakMedical Student, ShriAtalBihari Vajpayee Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mallika MittalMedical Student, Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.
Varshitha K KMedical Student, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Archana Sameer VinakarMedical Officer E, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, National Centre of Government of India, Dept of Atomic Energy, Colaba, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Daksh AgrawalMedical Intern, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Purvish M ParikhDepartment of Clinical Hematology, Sri Ram Cancer Center, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has introduced innovative blood- and stool-based biomarkers, improving early detection and enabling personalized solutions. Global and Indian adoption of CRC screening remains a public health challenge. This study evaluates the real-world utility of screening colonoscopy, as recommended by global guidelines. Methodology: A survey based on the American Medical Association (AMA) guidelines was designed, setting 45+ years as the cutoff age for colonoscopy screening. A Google form was shared via social media application with health care professionals. Participation was voluntary, responses were collected over 30 days, and data were analyzed. Results: A total of 2,199 individuals' data were analyzed. Among these, 1,374 were eligible for screening colonoscopy, out of which only 7.14% (98/1,374) actually underwent the procedure. Conclusion: Among various cancer programs, screening sigmoidoscopy has proved to improve both CRC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, its utilization is suboptimal, at best. Even among the highly educated medical community, the real-world utility was only in 7.14% of the eligible population. Barriers include invasive nature of intervention, need for appropriate bowel preparation, operator dependence, and small but significant risk of serious toxicity. An important method of increasing utility of screening colonoscopy is use of a test that can identify high-risk population, who can then be persuaded to undergo screening colonoscopy. This is the value of recently developed noninvasive blood- and stool-based tests, like Guardant Health's Shield. Being U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved with specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 84%, it should be offered to all eligible persons who can afford it, thereby increasing colonoscopy use and potentially saving lives.

Indexed as

cancer mortalityearly detectionliquid biopsymicrobiomepublic health

Identifiers

PMID40060340
PMCPMC11888814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.