ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2022
Association between clinical decision for patients with COVID-19 and post-traumatic stress symptoms among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical decision for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Japanese healthcare professionals were recruited. The survey was conducted from May 21 to June 18, 2021. PTSS was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Items about the experience of clinical decision for COVID-19 patients and other independent variables were originally developed from previous studies. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were used to examine the association of independent variables and PTSS. Results: 515 (3.9%) healthcare professionals completed all questions. Among them, 172 (33.4%) had experienced clinical decision for COVID-19 patients. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that clinical decision for COVID-19 patients (B=3.32, 95% CI 1.41-5.24; Conclusions: The study showed that clinical decision might be a very serious factor related to PTSS among healthcare professionals during the COVID-19. Clinical decision for patients with COVID-19 has a high experience rate and was considered to be a serious experience among healthcare professionals during the pandemic. As a countermeasure for the mental health of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19, it is important for healthcare professionals to take countermeasures for clinical decision for patients with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.